Home / Brands & Stores
Brands & Stores
Every brand whose products we've reviewed gets a page — how many of their products we've tagged, which lists they appear in, and what we'd buy or skip. Brand pages are generated from the product records, so the counts are always current.
- 299
- brands
- 540
- products
- 37
- stores
A brand tier is a summary, never a verdict.Tiers are computed from the products we've already tagged — a brand can have a “Strong record” and still have one product we'd skip, and a brand on watch can make one thing we love. Always read the product page. Brands we've fully reviewed also carry a safety grade — that one is our editorial verdict, and it links to the full review. How brand tiers are calculated
Brands A–Z(3 matches)
- BareAcceptablefood-dyes · We found no FDA food enforcement record naming a Bare product as of 2026-10-12, searched under Bare Foods, Bare Foods Co, Bare Snacks and Bare Fruit as recalling firm, and by the word "bare" in the product description across every recalling firm, which returned nothing at all. We found no CPSC record under Bare Snacks or Bare Foods. The parent's record is separate and is not Bare's: openFDA lists 27 recall events (53 records) under Frito-Lay between November 2012 and March 2026 and 19 events (23 records) under PepsiCo between March 2018 and September 2025, and none of those product descriptions names Bare. Two California Proposition 65 60-day notices name Bare products. AG 2020-01022, filed 2020-04-20, alleged lead and cadmium in "Bare – Beet Chips – Sea Salt" and named PepsiCo, Inc. and Nowhere Partners, Corp.; it was settled out of court on 2020-09-14 for a $4,000 civil penalty and $36,000 in fees, with PepsiCo agreeing to stop making or buying the product. AG 2021-00139, filed 2021-01-25, alleged lead in "Bare carrot chips" and named Bare Foods Co. and Target Corporation; it was settled out of court on 2021-05-01 for a $500 civil penalty and $31,000 in fees, with the product to be discontinued by 2021-10-31. Neither reached a court. Proposition 65 is a warning-label statute: a notice alleges that a product was sold without a required warning, not that it was found unsafe, and lead and cadmium are taken up from soil by root vegetables such as beets and carrots. We found no federal docket with Bare Foods or Bare Snacks in the case name on CourtListener as of 2026-10-12.
1products1lists0picks0avoid
- GoodPopRecommendedfood-dyes · GoodPop is the trade name of Austin's Natural Frozen Pops, Inc. The USDA Organic Integrity Database, read on 2026-10-12, lists that company, of Austin, Texas, as a certified organic handler under Oregon Tilth; the entry, re-read on 2026-10-14, lists its certified products by name, including Freezer Pops (Assorted — Cherry Limeade, Concord Grape, Fruit Punch) and about twenty popsicles, alongside ingredients it brokers. GoodPop is also a Certified B Corporation: B Lab's directory, read on 2026-10-12, lists it as certified since June 2017. B Corp certification measures governance, workers, community and environment, not what is in a product, so it is recorded here and is not what the grade rests on. We found no FDA food or drug enforcement record under GoodPop, Goodpop, Good Pop, GoodPops, Good Pops or Austin's Natural Frozen Pops, as recalling firm or in a product description, and no CPSC record under either name, as of 2026-10-12. We found no 60-day notice under California's Proposition 65, the state's warning-label law, naming GoodPop or Austin's Natural Frozen Pops as an alleged violator, and none naming GoodPop as the product, as of the same date. CourtListener searches on 2026-10-15 under both the trade name and the legal name return three federal dockets. Rodriguez v. Austin's Natural Frozen Pops, Inc. (E.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-02574, filed 2020-06-10, terminated 2020-08-04) and Contreras v. Goodpop LLC (S.D.N.Y. 1:21-cv-09233, filed 2021-11-08, terminated 2022-06-08) were Americans with Disabilities Act civil-rights cases, not product-safety or labeling matters. Austin's Natural Frozen Pops, Inc. v. Jonny Pops, LLC (W.D. Tex. 1:24-cv-00716, filed 2024-06-27) is pending. GoodPop is the plaintiff, alleging false advertising under the Lanham Act. JonnyPops answered in March 2025 with counterclaims, has amended them since, and was refused leave to amend them a third time in May 2026. We read the original counterclaim, which is free in CourtListener's RECAP archive, and not the amended versions. It argues that if JonnyPops's own fruit imagery and sugar content are found misleading, then GoodPop's statements that its products "never have ... refined sugars" and use "real, whole fruits, juices and purees" are misleading too, and it names several stick pops and ice-cream sandwiches; it does not name the freezer pops and does not allege a safety problem. Both sides moved for summary judgment in July 2026, and no ruling on either motion appears on the docket as of 2026-10-15. An order of 13 April 2026 set jury selection and trial for 30 November 2026; later scheduling orders are not in the free archive, so that date may have moved. Because this is a competitor's false-advertising dispute, not a product-safety matter, it is recorded here rather than as a litigation entry, and it does not move the grade.1products2lists0picks0avoid
- Partake FoodsAcceptablefood-dyes · Zero FDA food, drug and device enforcement records for Partake Foods. Zero CPSC recall records. Zero federal dockets name Partake Foods as a party on CourtListener. One California Proposition 65 60-day notice: AG number 2025-04185, filed 2025-10-10 by Clean Product Advocates, LLC through Cliffwood Law Firm, PC, alleging lead in "Partake Top 9 Allergen Free Vanilla Wafers" and naming Partake Foods, Inc. and The Kroger Company dba Ralphs. The register records no complaint, settlement or judgment against it, so it has not reached a court and is not recorded as litigation. Proposition 65 is a warning-label statute — a notice alleges a product was sold without a required warning, not that it was found unsafe, and lead occurs naturally in soil and in the oat, coconut and cocoa ingredients a cookie like this is built from. B Lab's own directory was opened in a browser on 2026-09-25 and confirms the certification: "Partake Foods, Inc.", headquartered in New York, Certified Since December 2022, overall B Impact score 87.1 against a median of 50.9 for businesses completing the assessment, website partakefoods.com, founder Denise Woodard, 2016. That is read off the register rather than inferred from search indexing.
1products3lists0picks0avoid
How brand tiers are calculated
Tiers derive from the SafeMama Scores and recall records of a brand's tagged products — nothing is assigned by hand, and a tier updates the moment its products do.
- On watchAny product currently under an active recall.
- Not yet ratedNo products with a computed SafeMama Score yet.
- Strong recordEvery scored product sits in the Safer-choice band (80 or above).
- Mixed recordAnything else — at least one scored product below 80.
The score formula itself is published at how we choose.