Sourcing safer products for families since 2007
SafeMama
Check home

Home / Brands / California Baby

California Baby logo

California Baby safety review

Founded 1995 · Los Angeles, California

Acceptable
Search Amazon for California Baby

Our verdict

Acceptable

California Baby is a founder-run Los Angeles company that has been making plant-based baby skincare since 1995, and it does something most brands its size do not: it owns the factory. Controlling your own FDA-registered facility means fewer hands between the formula and the bottle, which is a genuine structural advantage. We found no CPSC or FDA recalls. The reason this is an acceptable rather than a recommended grade is that the brand's central claims — "plant-based", "100% plant-based" — are its own, and we could not verify a third-party certification you could go and check for yourself.

Best for
Eczema-prone and sensitive baby skin, from a company that makes what it sells and has been doing it for three decades.
Skip if
Your child reacts to botanical or essential-oil ingredients — the line is built on plant extracts, and "plant-based" is not the same as "non-allergenic".

Reviewed by Dan Golden · September 2026

Company facts

What they make
skincare, body care, baby
Where it's made
Founded in 1995 by Jessica Iclisoy and still founder-led. Unusually for a personal-care brand this size, California Baby manufactures in its own FDA-registered facility in Los Angeles rather than contracting production out, and sources botanical ingredients from its own farm in central California.

The company behind California Baby

Founded
1995
Headquarters
Los Angeles, California (5933 Bowcroft St, Los Angeles, CA 90016)
Ownership
Independent

No outside owner who can reset the standards.

Ownership / parent companyIndependent
B Corp certifiedNot certified
1% for the PlanetNot a member

Safety breakdown

No CPSC recall records and no FDA enforcement records found. Manufacturing is in-house at an FDA-registered facility in Los Angeles. No California Proposition 65 notices name this brand (CA AG register swept 2026-08-22). One docketed federal class action over "natural" labeling, resolved 2026-08-30 — see litigation below.

California Baby on SafeMama

4 products reviewed · 3 lists · 0 SafeMama Picks

4
products reviewed
0
SafeMama Picks
0
we'd skip
3
best-of lists

No CPSC recall records and no FDA enforcement records found. Manufacturing is in-house at an FDA-registered facility in Los Angeles. No California Proposition 65 notices name this brand (CA AG register swept 2026-08-22). One docketed federal class action over "natural" labeling, resolved 2026-08-30 — see litigation below.

A brand tier is a summary, never a verdict — always read the product page. How tiers are calculated

Where this brand appears

California Baby products we track

California Baby Calming Hair Conditioner | 100% Plant-Based Kids Conditioner | Rinse-out or Leave in Conditioner | Lavender Scent | 251 mL / 8.5 oz
California Baby

California Baby Calming Hair Conditioner | 100% Plant-Based Kids Conditioner | Rinse-out or Leave in Conditioner | Lavender Scent | 251 mL / 8.5 oz

Recall history

No recalls found. We checked CPSC and FDA recall databases as of September 15, 2026 and found no recalls for this brand. Recall databases update continuously — if you own a recalled product, the official notice is always the source to follow.

Litigation watch

Court-record facts only. An allegation is a claim made in a filing, not a finding of wrongdoing.

  • Suarez v. Ralph, Paco & Roberto, Inc. (Honky Tots, Inc. and California Natural Living, Inc. d/b/a California Baby + Kids, among the alleged violators)Settled

    A putative class action alleging that products sold as "California Baby + Kids" were deceptively marketed as "natural." Two defendant entities are named as doing business as "California Baby + Kids": "Honky Tots, Inc." (terminated as a party 2018-02-06) and "California Natural Living, Inc." (remained a defendant through termination). The docket shows class_action: true and a monetary demand of $5,000; it terminated 2019-10-18 via disposition code 12 in the FJC Integrated Database, "Judgment on Consent." The full docket text (settlement terms, class definition, notice program) was not independently read — this comes from CourtListener's docket header and FJC IDB fields, not RECAP document text, so a human should read the actual filings before this is characterized more specifically than "resolved by consent judgment" in any published copy.

    U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · 7:17-cv-09847 · filed December 2017 · last checked August 2026 · primary source